TRADITIONAL MARKERS OF SEXUAL DESIRE

19 May

TRADITIONAL MARKERS  OF  SEXUAL  DESIRE
Evidence from nationally representative community samples of midlife women confirms that spontaneous sexual thinking is rather infrequent in the majority of sexually healthy women in long-term relationships (38,46,47).

Fantasies, which are a marker of sexual desire in DSM-IV-TR may, in fact, serve as a deliberate means of creating arousal and reinforcing desire. Data confirm the clinical experience that women fantasize to deliberately focus on their sexual feelings and avoid the distractions that are interfering with their sexual response (47).

Awareness of sexual desire is not the most frequent reason women accept or initiate sexual activity (1 – 6).

ASSESSMENT  OF  LOW  DESIRE/INTEREST  AND  THE ASSOCIATED LOW AROUSABILITY  TO  IDENTIFY THERAPEUTIC  OPTIONS

The DSM-IV-TR definition of hypoactive sexual desire disorder is problematic because its only focus is on initial desire, does not acknowledge the many reasons  that  motivate  the  woman  towards  sexual  activity,  and  ignores  the broad range of frequency of fantasies among sexually healthy women. An inter- national group has recently proposed the following definition for women’s sexual interest/desire disorder

There are absent or diminished feelings of sexual interest or desire, absent sexual thoughts or fantasies and a lack of responsive desire. Motivations  (here  defined as  reasons/incentives),  for  attempting  to become sexually aroused are scarce or absent. The lack of interest is considered to  be  beyond  a  normative  lessening with  lifecycle  and relationship duration (48).

Note that it is the additional lack of responsive desire that indicates dysfunction. The word “interest” was preferred (to “desire”) given the aforementioned relative infrequency of desire being the reason/incentive for engaging in sexual activity. However, for practical purposes of literature review, both words were included in the definition.

There is no clear division between assessment and management of desire/ interest concerns. The assessment often makes it clear why motivation is lacking, what is amiss with the context, what may be negatively influencing her arousability, and what is unsatisfactory about the outcome. The assessment is biopsychosocial as well as sexual and is aimed at identifying predisposing, precipitating, and maintaining etiological factors. Given the women’s sexuality is so contextual and given the known importance of partner factors including emotional intimacy (39,46), and sexual well being of the partner (37,39,49,50), there is need to interview both partners. Ideally, the couple is seen together as well as separately.

The current and past context—biological, psychosocial, as well as sexual— is clarified along with contextual details at the time of onset of the difficulties. The full picture of the woman’s sexual response and her partner’s response is obtained and importantly the degree of resulting distress is clarified. Predisposing factors are essentially intrapersonal—psychological factors that impair her arou- sability such as a fear of being vulnerable, guilt or shame regarding sex, past negative sexual experiences, distractions while trying to be sexually responsive, and excessive need for control. Recent careful assessment of consecutive women with low desire found significant disturbance in emotional stability and self- esteem (17). These researchers emphasized how low desire cannot be thought of as a discrete phase disorder. Rather, the evidence is that there is a generalized muting  of  the  sexual  response,  together  with  mood  instability  and  fragile self-regulation. Of biological factors reducing arousability, fatigue is perhaps the most common. Although, typically, there may be no definite mood disorder at  the  onset, women with low desire have  a  higher lifetime  prevalence  of depression (17,51,52) and clinical anxiety states (52). Recent studies suggest 50% of women with depression, experience low desire and arousal, even taking into account the potential lowering of desire from antidepressant medication (45). Debility from chronic disease such as renal failure, medications including most antidepressants, chronic pain, and less commonly, hyperpro- lactinemia and hypothyroid states are further inhibitors of arousability. The importance of the role of low androgen activity in reducing arousability in some  young  women  with  sudden  loss  of  ovarian  androgen and  in  women with pituitary disease where testosterone levels are suddenly reduced, appears secure. However, minimal scientific study exists on the role of low androgen simply in  relation to  age  and  natural  menopause and  will  be  addressed in detail later.

A hypothesis that women, and men, have a variable proneness to sexual excitement as well as a variable inhibition, is currently being scrutinized (53). This  variability  may  or  may  not  be  genetically  programmed.  Early  results suggest that women are more prone to inhibition than men, and this inhibition is more to do with negative consequences of activity, than fear of performance failure. Theoretically, women with higher inhibition proneness are more vulner- able to low desire/interest, whereas high-risk sexual behaviors may be a reflec- tion of low proneness to inhibition.

Lack of appropriate sexual context and sexual stimulation is a frequent pre- cipitating  and  maintaining cause of  low interest/desire.  Common examples include too little nongenital caressing and lack of privacy or safety. Interpersonal issues can be both precipitating and maintaining, particularly when there is minimal  emotional  intimacy  with  the  partner.  Expectation  of  a  negative outcome, for example, from dyspareunia or partner dysfunction is a further potent precipitating and/or maintaining factor. Clearly, a number of factors usually contribute. Occasionally, women with an emotionally traumatic past tell of sexual interest only when there is minimal emotional closeness with the partner in question. In other words, there is inability to sustain that interest/ desire when emotional intimacy with the partner develops. This is, therefore, a fear of intimacy—not strictly a sexual dysfunction.

Random Posts

Comments are closed.